ADJUVANT STRATEGIES TO ENHANCE THE ANALGESIC EFFECT OF MELOXICAM: EXPERIMENTAL RATIONALE FOR MULTIMODAL ANALGESIA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32782/2411-9164.23.2-12Keywords:
meloxicam, multimodal analgesia, adjuvant analgesics, gabapentin, pregabalin, amitriptyline, ketamine, dexmedetomidine, acetic acid writhing test, visceral pain, animal experimentAbstract
Background. Meloxicam (MEL), a predominantly selective COX-2 inhibitor, is known to reduce opioid requirements in postoperative patients; however, the choice of optimal dose and adjuvant combinations remains an unresolved clinical challenge. The combination of drugs within the framework of multimodal analgesia (MMA) aims to enhance efficacy and minimize adverse effects. Purpose – to evaluate the influence of adjuvant analgesics (gabapentin (GAB), pregabalin (PREG), amitriptyline hydrochloride (AMI), ketamine hydrochloride (KTM), and dexmedetomidine hydrochloride (DMM)) on the analgesic potency of MEL in a model of acute visceral pain. Materials and Methods. The study was conducted on 56 mature male white outbred mice randomized into 8 groups of 7 animals each. Visceral pain was modeled using the acetic acid–induced writhing test. Morphine (6.2 mg/kg) served as the reference drug. Meloxicam was administered at a dose of 1.9 mg/kg, both alone and in combination with GAB, PREG, AMI, KTM, or DMM. Results. Meloxicam monotherapy reduced the number of writhes to 36 [33; 37] (p < 0.001), corresponding to a 33.3% reduction in pain response versus control; however, its effect was 63.9% lower than that of morphine (p < 0.05). The addition of adjuvants progressively enhanced analgesia: MEL+GAB – 26 [22; 30] (p < 0.001 vs control; p = 0.02 vs MEL), MEL+PREG – 24 [22; 30] (p < 0.001 vs control; p = 0.03 vs MEL), MEL+AMI – 20 [18; 23] (p < 0.001 vs control; p = 0.03 vs MEL), MEL+KTM – 21 [17; 25] (p < 0.001 vs control; p < 0.001 vs MEL), MEL+DMM – 17 [15; 19] (p < 0.001 vs control; p < 0.001 vs MEL). The ordered sequence of medians (36 → 26 → 24 → 20 → 21 → 17) reflects a consistent hierarchy of analgesic enhancement, with the deepest and most stable reduction in pain reactions observed for combinations with dexmedetomidine and amitriptyline. Conclusions. In the acetic acid writhing test, meloxicam exhibits baseline analgesic activity, while the addition of gabapentin, pregabalin, amitriptyline, ketamine, or dexmedetomidine significantly enhances the analgesic effect. The most pronounced and stable results were observed for MEL+DMM and MEL+AMI combinations.
References
Kummer, I., Lüthi, A., Klingler, G., Andereggen, L., Urman, R. D., Luedi, M. M., & Stieger, A. (2024). Adjuvant Analgesics in Acute Pain – Evaluation of Efficacy. Current pain and headache reports, 28(9), 843–852. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11916-024-01276-w
Annaji, M., Mita, N., Heard, J., Kang, X., Poudel, I., Boddu, S. H. S., Tiwari, A. K., & Babu, R. J. (2024). Long-Acting Drug Delivery Technologies for Meloxicam as a Pain Medicine. Critical reviews in therapeutic drug carrier systems, 41(5), 111–150. https://doi.org/10.1615/CritRevTherDrugCarrierSyst.2024048988
Bekker, A., Kloepping, C., & Collingwood, S. (2018). Meloxicam in the management of postoperative pain: Narrative review. Journal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology, 34(4), 450–457. https://doi.org/10.4103/joacp.JOACP_133_18
Gupta, A. K., Mena, S., Jin, Z., Gan, T. J., & Bergese, S. (2021). Postoperative pain: a review of emerging therapeutic options. Expert review of neurotherapeutics, 21(10), 1085–1100. https://doi.org/10.1080/14737175.2021.1974840
Podder, D., Stala, O., Hirani, R., Karp, A. M., & Etienne, M. (2025). Comprehensive Approaches to Pain Management in Postoperative Spinal Surgery Patients: Advanced Strategies and Future Directions. Neurology international, 17(6), 94. https://doi.org/10.3390/neurolint17060094
Carron, M., Tamburini, E., Linassi, F., Pettenuzzo, T., Boscolo, A., & Navalesi, P. (2024). Efficacy of nonopioid analgesics and adjuvants in multimodal analgesia for reducing postoperative opioid consumption and complications in obesity: a systematic review and network metaanalysis. British journal of anaesthesia, 133(6), 1234–1249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2024.08.009
O’Neill, A., & Lirk, P. (2022). Multimodal Analgesia. Anesthesiology clinics, 40(3), 455–468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anclin.2022.04.002
Tesfaye, S., Sloan, G., Petrie, J., White, D., Bradburn, M., Julious, S., Rajbhandari, S., Sharma, S., Rayman, G., Gouni, R., Alam, U., Cooper, C., Loban, A., Sutherland, K., Glover, R., Waterhouse, S., Turton, E., Horspool, M., Gandhi, R., Maguire, D. OPTION-DM trial group (2022). Comparison of amitriptyline supplemented with pregabalin, pregabalin supplemented with amitriptyline, and duloxetine supplemented with pregabalin for the treatment of diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain (OPTION-DM): a multicentre, double-blind, randomised crossover trial. Lancet (London, England), 400(10353), 680–690. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(22)01472-6
Haffar, A, Fillingham, Y. A., Breckenridge, L., Gursay, D., Lonner, J. H. Meloxicam versus celecoxib for postoperative analgesia after total knee arthroplasty: safety, efficacy and cost. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews. 2022. 6(4), e22.00032. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-22-00032
Antiorio, A. T. F. B., Alemán-Laporte, J., de Freitas, A. P. P., Yamamoto, P. K., Cintra, L., & Mori, C. M. C. (2022). Administration of meloxicam to improve the welfare of mice in research: a systematic review (2000 – 2020). Veterinary research communications, 46(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11259-021-09868-2
Gawade, S. P. (2012). Acetic acid induced painful endogenous infliction in writhing test on mice. Journal of pharmacology & pharmacotherapeutics, 3(4), 348. https://doi.org/10.4103/0976-500X.103699
Стефанов, О. В. (Ред.). (2001). Доклінічні дослідження лікарських засобів: Методичні рекомендації. Київ: Авіцена. 527 с. URL: https://pubmed.com.ua/xmlui/handle/123456789/77






