ON THE ISSUE OF SYSTEM OF BLOOD COAGULATION AND HIS COMPLICATIONS IN PATIENTS WITH LVAD IN THE POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD

Authors

  • O.P. Mazurenko

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32782/2411-9164.19.1-8

Keywords:

left ventricle assist device (LVAD), anticoagulant targeted therapy (ATT), perioperative complications

Abstract

The work was carried out within the framework of a bilateral agreement on scientific cooperation between the department of Anesthesiology&Intensive Care in National Medical Academy of Post-Graduate Education Named After P.L. Shupik and the Silesian Center for Heart Diseases (Poland), as a final report. The purpose of this scientific work is to analyze the state of the blood coagulation system and its response to therapy and complications in the early postoperative period in fifty patients with implanted devices for mechanical support of the left ventricle, left ventricle assist device, LVAD, in the Silesian Heart Disease Center (Śląski Centrum Chorób Serca – SCCS), Poland. Patients were divided into two groups, a control group receiving classical anticoagulation targeted therapy (ATT), which included the most controlled monotherapy with heparin, after reaching the target values of APTT, the addition and transition to monotherapy with warfarin until reaching the target INR and ASA, and the main, research group, who received an alternative ATT consisting of the previous one with the addition of P2Y12- receptor blockers and Xa-factors. The result of the work demonstrated the benefit of the modified anticoagulant treatment scheme against the classical approach to reduce clinical complications with clear confirmation by correlation-regression indicators of a significant degree of reliability.

References

Wever-Pinzon O., Drakos S.G., Kfoury A.G. et al. Morbidity and mortality in heart transplant candidates supported with mechanical circulatory support: is reappraisal of the current Circulation. 2013 Jan 29; 127(4), pp. 452–462.

Akhter S.A., Badami A., Murray M., et al. Hospital Readmissions After Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation: Incidence, Causes, and Cost Analysis. Ann Thorac Surg. 2015 Sep;100(3), pp. 884–889.

Slaughter M.S., Pagani F.D., McGee E.C., et al. HeartWare Bridge to Transplant ADVANCE Trial Investigators. HeartWare ventricular assist system for bridge to transplant: combined results of the bridge to transplant and continued access protocol trial. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2013 Jul; 32(7), pp. 675–683.

Stulak J.M., Davis M.E., Haglund N., et al. Adverse events in contemporary continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices: A multi-institutional comparison shows significant differences. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016 Jan;151(1), pp. 177–189.

Harvey L., Holley C., Roy S.S., et al. Stroke After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation: Outcomes in the Continuous-Flow Era. Ann Thorac Surg. 2015;100(2), pp. 535–541.

Morgan J.A., Brewer R.J., Nemeh H.W., et al. Stroke while on long-term left ventricular assist device support: incidence, outcome, and predictors. ASAIO J. 2014 May–Jun; 60(3), pp. 284–289.

Xia Y., Stern D., Friedmann P, Goldstein D. Preoperative atrial fibrillation may not increase thromboembolic events in left ventricular assist device recipients on midterm follow-up. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2016; 35(7), pp. 906–912.

Najjar S.S., Slaughter M.S., Pagani F.D., et al. HVAD Bridge to Transplant ADVANCE Trial Investigators. An analysis of pump thrombus events in patients in the HeartWare ADVANCE bridge to transplant and continued access protocol trial. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2014 Jan; 33(1), pp. 23–34.

Uriel N., Morrison K.A., Garan A.R., et al. Development of a novel echocardiography ramp test for speed optimization and diagnosis of device thrombosis in continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices: the Columbia ramp study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Oct 30; 60 (18), pp. 1764–75.

Maltais S., Kilic A., Nathan S., et al. Prevention of HeartMate II Pump Thrombosis Through Clinical Management (PREVENT). J Heart Lung Transplant. 2016; 35(4), pp. S161–S162.

Starling R.C., Moazami N., Silvestry S.C. et al. Unexpected abrupt increase in left ventricular assist device thrombosis. N Engl J Med. 2014; 370(1), pp. 33–40.

Saeed D., Maxhera B., Albert A., Westenfeld R., Hoffmann T., Lichtenberg A. Conservative approaches for HeartWare ventricular assist device pump thrombosis may improve the outcome compared with immediate surgical approaches. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2016; 23(1), pp. 90–95.

Haglund N.A., Davis M.E., Tricarico N.M., Keebler M.E., Maltais S. Readmissions After Continuous Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation: Differences Observed Between Two Contemporary Device Types. ASAIO J. 2015 Jul–Aug; 61(4), pp. 410–416.

Topkara V.K., Kondareddy S., Malik F., et al. Infectious complications in patients with left ventricular assist device: etiology and outcomes in the continuous-flow era. Ann Thorac Surg. 2010 Oct;90(4), pp. 1270–7.

Leuck A.M. Left ventricular assist device driveline infections: recent advances and future goals. J Thorac Dis. 2015 Dec;7(12), pp. 2151–7.

Downloads

Published

2024-05-10

How to Cite

Mazurenko О. (2024). ON THE ISSUE OF SYSTEM OF BLOOD COAGULATION AND HIS COMPLICATIONS IN PATIENTS WITH LVAD IN THE POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD. Clinical Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine, (1), 69–80. https://doi.org/10.32782/2411-9164.19.1-8